Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-293 of 293. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Five-star reviews praise professional installation, neat work, and quick service. However, recent contract customers report lost contact, delayed responses, and pressure to upsell expensive services. One customer was misdiagnosed on a gas leak and left without resolution. Overall mixed record.
Only three Google reviews exist, so the picture is thin. One reviewer praised a repair that avoided an unneeded system replacement. Another said a servicing job was overpriced and left a unit leaking water.
All eight reviews are five-star. Customers praise fast response times, skilled technicians who explain work clearly, and competitive pricing. One reviewer compared them favorably to major retailers on price and service quality. Contract holders value timely notifications and consistent professionalism across repeat visits.
Long-term customers value their proactive contract management and patient service. Technicians report on unit condition after each visit and remind clients of upcoming maintenance.
Reviews split sharply. Several 5-star reviewers praise punctual, thorough servicing and fair prices. Long-term customers, though, describe late arrivals, shorter cleaning visits and a contract renewal they felt was sprung on them.
Reviews are mostly positive, with praise for fair prices, polite technicians, and thorough cleaning. Only 14 Google reviews exist, and one older 1-star review describes a mix-up with another firm.
Review evidence is limited: only two recent reviews exist, one praising basic work and one calling service "worst" without specifics. Rating sits at 3.8 across a small sample.
One Google review, five stars, describes a chemical clean that removed a musty smell from the aircon. The reviewer says their children with rhinitis breathe easier. Evidence is very limited.
Long-standing clients report reliable service and fair prices over years. New or occasional customers encounter aggressive upselling, poor job quality (dust in blowers, units failing weeks after service), and staff who become hostile if asked to refuse extras.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One review praising friendly, knowledgeable technicians and service quality. Limited evidence from a single rating.
Only five written reviews were available, so the picture is thin. Two reviewers praised the work and a named technician. Two others reported a messy visit, unhelpful after-sales help, and a bill above the quote.
Reviewers consistently praise Cool-Air's skilled technicians, team stability, and thorough work, especially over long-term contracts. Several loyal clients report four or more years of reliable service with the same staff. However, critical one-star reviews describe rushed servicing visits, faulty installations that required expensive follow-up repairs, and unaccountable billing for the company's own errors.
Most reviewers describe friendly, prompt service at fair prices, and many say they would return. Review text is limited, with 13 written reviews, and one older 1-star complaint is about records and follow-up.
Most customers report smooth installations and repairs with courteous staff who protect furniture and clean up thoroughly. One older complaint raised doubt about a diagnostic, though five-star reviews consistently praise honesty and value.
All eight reviews rate the business at five stars. Reviewers consistently praise quick response times, professional technicians who explain their work, and fair pricing. Services praised include steamer and chemical overhaul work.
Five-star reviews from loyal customers praise skilled technicians, fair prices, and professional work. However, recent complaints show a troubling pattern: techs caused leaks and compressor damage, then ghosted customers; faulty gas top-ups left units not cold; appointment slots span an hour with no firm time. Responsiveness appears inconsistent and deteriorating.
Fourteen Google reviews give a 3.6 average, with most five-star praise for careful cleaning and friendly technicians. Several one-star reviews cite late arrivals and a repair that failed within a month. The sample is small and spans many years.
Only five Google reviews exist, so the picture is thin. Two 5-star reviews praise a clean fix and named technicians. Two 1-star reviews describe a late arrival and a slow return to fix their own error.
All eight reviews rank Airconman at five stars over three years. Customers praise punctual technicians who explain problems clearly, keep work areas clean, and avoid hard selling. Pricing draws repeated mention as reasonable; staff prove flexible with last-minute reschedules and back service calls during warranty periods.
Kenny and his team stand out for straightforward advice and honest quotations. Customers report prompt, skilled installations and repairs, with attention paid to their space constraints and budget. One early complaint about communication remains an outlier.
Seven Google reviews give this Bishan firm a perfect 5 average. Reviewers mention a responsive support team, professional staff, and fair prices. Review evidence is limited, and most reviews are from five to six years ago.
Three recent reviews, all five-star, praise careful work and punctual, professional visits. Review evidence is limited to seven ratings and three written comments, so treat this as an early picture.
All 13 reviews are five-star. Customers praise professional technicians, transparent pricing, and swift turnarounds. Evidence is limited; reviews lack detail on specific issues fixed or service scope beyond general satisfaction.
Loyal customers praise the owner Alvin Yip for honesty, technicians for speed and clean workmanship, and ability to fix leaks others cannot. Several complaints centre on inflated parts quotes and phone reception staff causing no-shows and booking errors.
Half the recent reviews rate Flash Aircon at five stars, praising polite staff and neat workmanship. The other half give one or two stars, citing repeated missed appointments, last-minute cancellations, and poor responsiveness to maintenance scheduling. Some customers report chasing the company for weeks without resolution, leading them to switch providers.
Only three Google reviews exist, so the evidence is thin. One praises fast, professional work. Two 1-star reviews describe leaks and no replies after follow-ups.
Two reviews offer limited insight. One praises completion of a complex job; the other criticises coordination with Mitsubishi over a faulty unit exchange and expresses frustration at repeated servicing in eight months.
LAGC Private Limited has five Google reviews, all five-star. No review text is available, so detail on the work itself is limited. Their website lists installation, maintenance, and emergency repair services.
All eight reviews rate five stars. Customers praise fast response times, honest diagnostics that avoid unnecessary work, and thorough cleaning. Staff solve problems on the day they're called and explain issues clearly. Installation and regular maintenance work earns specific mention for tidiness and attention to detail.
Best work comes from technicians like Brendon and Nick, who diagnose honestly and explain problems before charging. Reliability is the core issue: multiple customers report no-shows despite confirmed bookings, missed follow-ups lasting weeks, and repair quotes only revealed after work is done. Pricing complaints run deep-one customer paid $500 for a $200 job-and responses to concerns are dismissive.
Most customers come back repeatedly and praise thorough cleaning and professional service. One reviewer flagged concerns about honest assessment, though acknowledged quick responses.
Only eight Google reviews, so the picture is thin. Ratings split sharply: some praise for friendly, tidy staff, but several one-star reports cite late arrivals and a chemical clean that never happened.
Five-star reviews across seven ratings highlight professional work at reasonable prices. Limited recent review detail available, though praise points to skilled staff and straightforward charges.
Most reviews praise quick scheduling, thorough work, and fair pricing on servicing and chemical cleaning. One older complaint noted unresponsiveness to an inquiry; recent feedback is solidly positive.
Long-standing customers praise Takai Yama for professional work, responsive service, and genuine trustworthiness. One aged complaint suggests occasional gaps in what service covers.
Kpa Engineering has 4.3 stars from 13 Google reviews, with most reviewers rating it highly. Only three recent reviews are visible, so the picture is thin. One older review describes a missed visit with no warning.
Only five Google reviews exist, all from roughly eight to nine years ago. Reviewers praise the energy-efficient industrial chillers and the firm's technical know-how. The sample is too small to judge recent service quality.
All three available Google reviews award five stars. Detail on specific work or staff is limited, so praise is broad rather than grounded in concrete experience.
All three reviews are five-star. One mentions strong value and reliable after-sales care, suggesting dependable maintenance at fair prices.
Most jobs finish on time with staff that answer quickly and treat customers politely. One install went rough: damaged floor tiles, incomplete cleaning of parts, and delays waiting for gas top-up. Most reviewers report the work holds and recommend the service.
Opinions split sharply: many report fast, clean installation and reliable maintenance when service runs smoothly, with staff named for responsiveness. Others describe poor follow-up on enquiries, services performed without consent, and difficulty rescheduling missed visits. Staff conduct on-site (politeness, tidiness) draws consistent praise; management coordination does not.
All four reviews rate Zoom Hands five stars, citing trustworthiness, professional service, and reliability. Evidence is limited to brief praise with no detail on specific services, pricing, or wait times.
Only five Google reviews, so the picture is thin. Most are older 5-star notes praising fair prices, a chemical wash, and a late-night call answered. One recent 1-star review reports slow replies and unanswered calls.
Some long-term customers praise the clean, careful servicing and friendly technicians. Many recent complaints describe repeat faults, leaking pipes, and warranty disputes. With a 3.0 rating across 53 Google reviews, results are mixed.
Only one Google review exists, and it is a 1-star complaint. The reviewer says they paid a package in full, then could not reach the business after two servicings. Evidence is too thin to judge service quality.
Array Engineering offers aircon installation across Singapore. Review evidence is limited to a single brief comment, so detailed service breakdown is not possible.
Three reviewers over a decade ago reported fast leak repairs, fair quotes without upselling, and follow-up service kept as promised. Limited recent evidence.
Two five-star reviews from six years ago consistently praise AL Aircon for quick responsiveness, transparent pricing, and detailed explanations of work. Detail on recent performance is limited.
Many reviewers praise the team for quick, clean work and reasonable rates. Several five-star jobs show excellent installation and chemical cleaning results. However, a cluster of one-star reviews from the same period flags serious gaps: technicians quoting prices without itemization, charging for work that did not solve the problem, and brushing off follow-up questions. The company appears capable on good days but inconsistent in communication and accountability.
One five-star review from six years ago reports friendly staff and good service, though review volume is minimal. Pricing is transparent and published on the website for servicing and chemical overhauls across different unit counts.
Alfred earned strong praise for his technical know-how and the business's cleaning work. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, but both speak to competent hands-on service.
Only four Google reviews exist, so the picture is thin. One five-star review praises friendly, easy-to-deal-with staff. One one-star review says a repair was left unfinished and a payment dispute went to court.
One 5-star review praises quick responses and fair rates. A 1-star review flags recurring water leaks within months of repair, unresponsiveness to callbacks, and eventual silence from the business. Evidence is thin: only 4 reviews across 7 years.
Reviews are mostly one or two stars, with the office phone team the most criticised. Several customers describe rude or condescending staff, and one long-time client quit after a complaint went unanswered. Field technicians get better marks, though one customer said skilled staff had left.
One caller praised the technician's knowledge and punctuality for a PBC board replacement. Another reported the office staff seemed unaware the business handled air conditioning, raising questions about consistency.
Limited review evidence: one five-star rating on Google. Their website lists maintenance contracts from $215 for three units yearly, plus one-time servicing from $25 to $43.60 per unit, with chemical wash and gas top-up also available. They serve most of Singapore.
Only 17 Google reviews, so the picture is thin. Recent five-star reviews praise punctual, thorough servicing and chemical cleaning. Older one-star reviews describe late visits, unanswered calls, and disputed charges.
Only five Google reviews exist, so the evidence is thin. Two five-star reviews praise the service and one named technician. Two one-star reviews report a repeat leak and a reckless driver.
Mechstar responds quickly to requests and delivers solid installation work, particularly for HDB and condo units. Customers report fair pricing and genuine follow-up help with minor issues after the job is done, though limited feedback overall.
Review evidence is limited: one recent one-star complaint about unresponsiveness and one five-star mention offer little texture. The business's website lists IAQ auditing, duct cleaning, and AHU disinfection services, but customer experience detail is sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five Google reviews give Billy Aircon Jurong a 4.2 average. Four praise courteous, thorough technicians. One 1-star review reports a missed appointment and a disputed chemical wash. Review evidence is limited.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All four reviews rate this Kovan-based service five stars. Customers praise fair pricing, honest work, and technician Alvin's skill and willingness to fit emergency repairs despite his schedule. No complaints surface in the available record.
Strong service and fair rates win regular clients, but repeated complaints about high-pressure tactics-especially targeting renters with threatened contract breaches-and contract reinterpretation after payment mark a troubling pattern. Service quality is uneven: some technicians solve problems well, others lack knowledge or cause damage.
Limited review evidence: a split 3-star average from 2 ratings shows mixed experience. Their website lists maintenance contracts, chemical wash, and gas top-up services, with promotional pricing ($25–$215 for contracts and multi-unit jobs). Without detailed review text, the specific reasons for the rating spread cannot be determined.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Limited review data: one detailed complaint describes costly repeat visits and pressure to add services not needed on first visit, plus frustration over lost records despite being an existing customer from 2020.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Strong work on jobs, but customer relations are a risk. Five-star reviews praise punctual arrival, clean work, and long-term loyalty; one-star reviews flag defensive responses to problems, unwillingness to adjust hours, and unexpected charges after service failures.
Most reviewers report leaks that continued after visits, loose parts, and pushy add-on charges. Several say follow-up messages went unanswered. One reviewer praised a quick, tidy servicing. Two reviewers mention police or CASE complaints. Review evidence is heavily negative.
Aircon Service, Chemical Wash & Overhaul operates in Yishun with published rates for normal servicing and chemical wash work. No individual review text is available, so assessment is limited to their stated service offerings and pricing structure.
Most recent reviewers report failed troubleshooting, mysterious charges for services not rendered, and staff who dismiss legitimate complaints. Two older positive reviews credit reliable past service, yet eight one-star accounts spanning years describe unresolved problems, evasiveness, and inflated costs. The 1.8 rating reflects a consistent pattern of service falling short.
Review evidence for this Sembawang firm is very limited. No individual review text is available. The profile rests on the business's own website, which lists industrial and commercial M&E work and claims 25+ years of operation.
Review evidence for this Central Area firm is limited, with no individual review text available. Its website describes repair, installation, and maintenance work for ACMV systems, including round-the-clock response. Reader feedback on service quality is not yet available.
NC Aircon Servicing is a Bukit Merah business with no Google review text to read. Its own website lists servicing, repairs, installation and chemical wash. Review evidence is limited, so no reviewer views can be reported.
Review evidence is limited. Global Advanced Tech Enterprise is based in Ang Mo Kio and offers air conditioning installation, maintenance contracts, and related services across Singapore, including testing, commissioning, and ventilation work.
No individual reviews are available to assess customer experience or service quality. The business publishes detailed pricing for common jobs (general service from $25 per unit; chemical wash from $60 per unit) and claims 15+ years of operation with certifications in aircon installation.
No individual reviews are available to assess this business. Kwang Wah Engineering is a BCA Registered Contractor (ME01 - L2) based in Tampines that has offered air-con installation, mechanical ventilation, and alterations work since 2010.
Review evidence is limited; no customer feedback available. Winsteam Engineering & Construction lists emergency ACMV services among a wide range of MEP work. Their website claims BCA and SCDF compliance, ISO-aligned processes, and operation since 1994.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists installation, servicing, maintenance, and chemical overhaul on its website, with islandwide coverage and prices starting at $1,188 for a Daikin system. Concrete customer feedback is not available to assess reliability or workmanship.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. The business holds BCA registration as an L2 contractor and ACMV specialist, and lists central, VRV, and ductless aircon installation plus maintenance and servicing across Singapore. Further detail depends on customer feedback.
No detailed reviews are available for this business. It is registered as a Google-verified service provider offering installation, maintenance, repair, and emergency aircon work across Singapore. Pricing and service options are published on their website; prospective customers should contact them directly to confirm availability and current rates.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review detail is limited: no customer feedback text is available to assess their installation quality, response times, or reliability. Their website publishes fixed pricing for servicing and chemical work, with surcharges for evening, weekend, and CBD visits.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists maintenance and contracting services for Singapore. Their website states they serve the full island, but specific feedback on their work is not available from the inputs provided.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-11-15