Page 2 of 2: businesses ranked 101-146 of 146. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Kenny and his team stand out for straightforward advice and honest quotations. Customers report prompt, skilled installations and repairs, with attention paid to their space constraints and budget. One early complaint about communication remains an outlier.
One five-star review offers limited detail but suggests straightforward service. KSB claims to offer air conditioning installation and broader mechanical work since 2008, with Level 3 BizSAFE certification.
Half the recent reviews rate Flash Aircon at five stars, praising polite staff and neat workmanship. The other half give one or two stars, citing repeated missed appointments, last-minute cancellations, and poor responsiveness to maintenance scheduling. Some customers report chasing the company for weeks without resolution, leading them to switch providers.
Two reviews offer limited insight. One praises completion of a complex job; the other criticises coordination with Mitsubishi over a faulty unit exchange and expresses frustration at repeated servicing in eight months.
Toyo Aircon divides sharply: half the reviews praise punctuality and thorough work, while the other half report chronic lateness, rushed service, and deteriorating quality. Recent complaints describe technicians breaking agreed appointment windows, cleaning in under 20 minutes that once took an hour, and staff who fail to keep promises (like assigning Japanese-speaking personnel). The business lists annual maintenance contracts starting at S$250 for two units, but several long-term customers felt shortchanged after years of loyal use.
One five-star review praised reliable installation work. A recent one-star complaint centres on irresponsible company vehicle parking in residential areas, blocking residents and the road. Evidence is limited with only two reviews spanning four years.
When the team arrives, they deliver solid technical work and treat your home with care. Phone interactions and reliability are weaker: staff rudeness, missed appointments, ghosting after service, and unresolved cooling problems sour the experience. Inconsistency marks this business.
Most reviews praise quick scheduling, thorough work, and fair pricing on servicing and chemical cleaning. One older complaint noted unresponsiveness to an inquiry; recent feedback is solidly positive.
Five-star reviews spanning a decade show steady trust. Lucius appears by name as the go-to technician. Customers cite responsiveness, reliability across homes and workplaces, and value-for-money pricing.
Reviewers across multiple years praise clear communication, attentive technicians who explain maintenance options, and clean, considerate work. Evidence is limited to older reviews; current performance cannot be fully assessed.
Most recent reviews praise prompt contact and service quality, though an older complaint about a no-show without notification stands out. Limited review detail overall.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One five-star review credits Supreme Air Services with an aircon system still running reliably after five years, suggesting durability and stable performance. Limited review evidence, but the customer's consideration of upgrading to a higher system indicates satisfaction with the install quality.
One five-star review on file. Towa Marine operates across marine and industrial cooling systems with 30+ years in business, though direct customer insight is limited.
One recent reviewer reported paying $340 for eight units serviced with only filter washing and vacuuming, roughly double what competitors charge, and a unit began leaking water that damaged flooring. An older five-star review praised workmanship and trustworthiness, but the limited and polarised feedback makes this hard to assess.
A polarized track record: long-term clients praise punctual service and reasonable maintenance packages, but the majority of reviewers report chronic leaks and poor installation workmanship. Pipe connections and gas fittings are frequently identified as sources of recurring problems; several customers say D.I.S. delayed repairs past the warranty period, then charged for fixes. Damage during installation, no-shows, and unresponsive follow-up are documented. One customer pursued small claims court action over repair costs. A few clients with positive experiences cite competent technicians (Aris, Mike, A Hua) and clean workmanship, but these accounts are far outnumbered by complaints of shoddy piping, failed troubleshooting, and poor after-sales communication.
Most customers report high-pressure sales tactics, inflated charges for unnecessary services, and poor workmanship that leaves problems unresolved. Staff frequently suggest expensive deep cleaning or parts replacement without justification, offer conflicting quotes, and ignore follow-up requests when issues persist after service.
Three reviewers over a decade ago reported fast leak repairs, fair quotes without upselling, and follow-up service kept as promised. Limited recent evidence.
Both reviewers praised detailed installation work that goes beyond surface-level service, combined with fair pricing and approachable staff. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews from three years ago.
Recent customers praise swift WhatsApp replies and practical help with old unit removal and new condenser placement. Older reviews report silent treatment on calls and quotes that seemed high compared to competitors in the same area.
Alfred earned strong praise for his technical know-how and the business's cleaning work. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, but both speak to competent hands-on service.
One 5-star review praises quick responses and fair rates. A 1-star review flags recurring water leaks within months of repair, unresponsiveness to callbacks, and eventual silence from the business. Evidence is thin: only 4 reviews across 7 years.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Single five-star review supports the business's claims. Evidence is limited: no detailed review text available to assess workmanship, responsiveness, or reliability in practice. Pricing and credentials are published transparently online.
Older reviews praise professional service and thorough work, but a recent one-star experience documents a failed second appointment with no response for hours and inadequate chemical washing that moulded within five months, contradicting the company's own earlier receipt.
Review evidence is limited: one recent one-star complaint about unresponsiveness and one five-star mention offer little texture. The business's website lists IAQ auditing, duct cleaning, and AHU disinfection services, but customer experience detail is sparse.
One five-star review supports the rating, but detail is limited. The business operates in commercial and industrial air conditioning alongside broader distribution services.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
A-Class Aircon Management shows split sentiment: two reviewers praise a named technician and years of consistent service, but three others report dangerous driving by company drivers and poor servicing that caused units to leak within a month. Scheduling is fast, but quality control appears weak.
Limited review data: one detailed complaint describes costly repeat visits and pressure to add services not needed on first visit, plus frustration over lost records despite being an existing customer from 2020.
Strong work on jobs, but customer relations are a risk. Five-star reviews praise punctual arrival, clean work, and long-term loyalty; one-star reviews flag defensive responses to problems, unwillingness to adjust hours, and unexpected charges after service failures.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two reviews totalling just 3 stars give no evidence of reliable service. Customers report chemical cleaning without full dismantling, failed repairs requiring multiple visits, and a new FCU that leaked gas within days. Trust concerns and overcharging appear central to the poor ratings.
Review evidence is limited for this business. Delta Sirius claims over 30 years in operation and lists duct sealing, duct cleaning, and commercial HVAC services; however, no customer reviews are available to verify their work quality or service reliability.
No individual reviews are available to assess customer experience or service quality. The business publishes detailed pricing for common jobs (general service from $25 per unit; chemical wash from $60 per unit) and claims 15+ years of operation with certifications in aircon installation.
Review evidence is limited; no customer feedback available. Winsteam Engineering & Construction lists emergency ACMV services among a wide range of MEP work. Their website claims BCA and SCDF compliance, ISO-aligned processes, and operation since 1994.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists installation, servicing, maintenance, and chemical overhaul on its website, with islandwide coverage and prices starting at $1,188 for a Daikin system. Concrete customer feedback is not available to assess reliability or workmanship.
Review data is not available for this business. Their website states they have operated since 1939 and hold Certified Comfort Expert certification. Service range spans residential mini-splits to commercial rooftop units, though customer experience details cannot be assessed from available sources.
Review evidence is limited. The business holds BCA registration as an L2 contractor and ACMV specialist, and lists central, VRV, and ductless aircon installation plus maintenance and servicing across Singapore. Further detail depends on customer feedback.
Review evidence is limited. The business states it has 18 years of operating history and offers sales, services, repair, and installation of air conditioning units.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists maintenance and contracting services for Singapore. Their website states they serve the full island, but specific feedback on their work is not available from the inputs provided.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-15