Page 4 of 6: businesses ranked 301-400 of 515. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Most reviews praise quick scheduling, thorough work, and fair pricing on servicing and chemical cleaning. One older complaint noted unresponsiveness to an inquiry; recent feedback is solidly positive.
The split view reflects one satisfied installation experience against three separate accounts of poor follow-up and malfunctioning units. Reviewers praise initial professionalism and site supervisor Mr Mahfuz's thoroughness, but most complaints centre on equipment failure under warranty and staff becoming unresponsive once the job is done.
Most jobs finish on time with staff that answer quickly and treat customers politely. One install went rough: damaged floor tiles, incomplete cleaning of parts, and delays waiting for gas top-up. Most reviewers report the work holds and recommend the service.
Five recent reviews (all five-star) commend Novus Technik for energy-saving chillers and experienced technical capability, though review detail is limited.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All three available Google reviews award five stars. Detail on specific work or staff is limited, so praise is broad rather than grounded in concrete experience.
Older reviews praise quick, courteous work, but a recent complaint flags pushy extras and incomplete cleaning. Detail is limited across just three reviews.
Ah Heng, their technician, impressed a customer with skill and reliability even during difficult weather. Limited review data makes broader assessment difficult.
Five-star reviews spanning a decade show steady trust. Lucius appears by name as the go-to technician. Customers cite responsiveness, reliability across homes and workplaces, and value-for-money pricing.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Reviewers across multiple years praise clear communication, attentive technicians who explain maintenance options, and clean, considerate work. Evidence is limited to older reviews; current performance cannot be fully assessed.
Most reviewers praise professionalism and technical competence, but responsiveness varies. Limited detail in available reviews.
Strong spots and serious gaps mix here. A long-term customer praised their ability to fix old units and diagnose complex wiring faults, while another reported Ah Wei quickly found and corrected a cross-wiring installation error. Yet installation defects dominate complaints: one household endured repeated water flooding for months after a new install with no fix; another paid over $500 for outdoor cleaning and refrigerant top-up without proper pressure measurement, leaving units still inadequately cold; a third saw an undiagnosed gas leak cost over $100 with no real resolution.
All four reviews rate Zoom Hands five stars, citing trustworthiness, professional service, and reliability. Evidence is limited to brief praise with no detail on specific services, pricing, or wait times.
Older reviews praise Sky Breeze for reliability and straightforward pricing, but recent complaints highlight gaps: missed services, unresponsive management, and inconsistent technician care. Evidence on current service quality is limited and mixed.
Many reviewers praise the team for quick, clean work and reasonable rates. Several five-star jobs show excellent installation and chemical cleaning results. However, a cluster of one-star reviews from the same period flags serious gaps: technicians quoting prices without itemization, charging for work that did not solve the problem, and brushing off follow-up questions. The company appears capable on good days but inconsistent in communication and accountability.
One five-star review credits Supreme Air Services with an aircon system still running reliably after five years, suggesting durability and stable performance. Limited review evidence, but the customer's consideration of upgrading to a higher system indicates satisfaction with the install quality.
Two reviews average 4 stars. Detail is limited without review text, but the rating reflects solid customer experience. ebm-papst SEA supplies and installs specialty fans and controllers across Southeast Asia.
One recent reviewer reported paying $340 for eight units serviced with only filter washing and vacuuming, roughly double what competitors charge, and a unit began leaking water that damaged flooring. An older five-star review praised workmanship and trustworthiness, but the limited and polarised feedback makes this hard to assess.
One reviewer praised straightforward diagnostics and fair quotes, contrasting the technician's honesty against pushier competitors.
Superbreeze attracts divided opinions: a handful of reviewers praise fast arrival and willingness to fit last-minute jobs, but the overwhelming majority report aggressive upselling, inflated charges for services they never authorised, and poor outcomes that require callbacks. One common pattern is staff pushing expensive chemical washes or compressor replacements (quoted at $300-$900 per unit) after diagnostic visits, then charging for partial work or refusing refunds; another is aircons leaking or failing shortly after service, with no response from the company when asked to fix it. The business trades on quick turnarounds and casual flexibility but loses trust through lack of transparency and follow-through. Refund disputes linger unresolved, technicians sometimes skip basic steps (vacuuming, opening the unit during inspection), and the tone in interactions is described as pushy rather than collaborative. For those burned by high-pressure selling and unresolved leaks, the brand epitomises poor aircon service.
One five-star review from four years ago praises the business for affordable and trusted air conditioning work, though limited recent feedback means the current service picture is unclear.
Two customers praise Mr Tang and the owner for transparent, thorough servicing that outperforms rivals, with honest advice on what's actually needed. One customer reports overcharging, ignored follow-ups, and a persistent smell after servicing three units, leaving unresolved complaints.
Limited review evidence, but both five-star ratings praise solid work at reasonable cost.
One five-star review on file. Towa Marine operates across marine and industrial cooling systems with 30+ years in business, though direct customer insight is limited.
One Google review gave 5 stars, but volume is thin. Their website lists aircon installation, repair, maintenance, and commercial services, with servicing from $30 and system installations ranging $2,000–$3,800. BCA-approved and operating since 2012.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Array Engineering offers aircon installation across Singapore. Review evidence is limited to a single brief comment, so detailed service breakdown is not possible.
Three reviewers over a decade ago reported fast leak repairs, fair quotes without upselling, and follow-up service kept as promised. Limited recent evidence.
One early review reports a generally happy experience with Airconpros despite encountering some initial problems that were resolved.
One five-star review on file; limited evidence to assess service quality or consistency.
Most customers experience fast, affordable service with knowledgeable technicians who deliver visible cooling improvements. One reviewer flagged invoice errors and slow admin response, though the technician's hands-on work was praised.
Both reviewers reported smooth, professional jobs with staff who explained issues clearly and went beyond the job scope. One job involved industrial building prep with diagnostic work and compressor cleaning; the other was straightforward installation.
One five-star review from six years ago reports friendly staff and good service, though review volume is minimal. Pricing is transparent and published on the website for servicing and chemical overhauls across different unit counts.
Both reviewers praised detailed installation work that goes beyond surface-level service, combined with fair pricing and approachable staff. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews from three years ago.
Most recent reviews praise prompt contact and service quality, though an older complaint about a no-show without notification stands out. Limited review detail overall.
Alfred earned strong praise for his technical know-how and the business's cleaning work. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, but both speak to competent hands-on service.
Recent years show strong work: technicians explain clearly, handle chemical cleaning well, and charge reasonably. Older reviews flag serious issues: staff rudeness, no-shows blamed on car problems, misdiagnosed repairs, and slow response times. The 3.5-star average reflects a split: loyal repeat customers versus buyers burned by poor communication and surprise charges.
One 5-star review praises quick responses and fair rates. A 1-star review flags recurring water leaks within months of repair, unresponsiveness to callbacks, and eventual silence from the business. Evidence is thin: only 4 reviews across 7 years.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Four five-star reviews over three years praise quick responses, clean work, and fair prices. One older low rating is not detailed enough to assess. The five-star pattern shows consistent satisfaction with installations and follow-up service.
Two installations ran on schedule with friendly, skilled technicians. Pricing felt fair and transparent. One job suffered a post-install water leak; follow-up took 13 days and warranty card process was confusing. Sales staff located overseas, product knowledge gaps emerged. Evidence is limited to three reviews over four years.
One caller praised the technician's knowledge and punctuality for a PBC board replacement. Another reported the office staff seemed unaware the business handled air conditioning, raising questions about consistency.
Review evidence is limited: two one-star complaints span three years and detail pricing confusion and a damage dispute the business disputed. The business's website offers servicing and installation across Singapore's regions, but recent customer experience details are sparse.
One reviewer praised a technician for expertise and service. Another reported a unit failed within a month after installation, then faced denial of warranty and demands for additional payment, with complaints about quoted prices changing later.
Older reviews praise professional service and thorough work, but a recent one-star experience documents a failed second appointment with no response for hours and inadequate chemical washing that moulded within five months, contradicting the company's own earlier receipt.
Review evidence is limited: one recent one-star complaint about unresponsiveness and one five-star mention offer little texture. The business's website lists IAQ auditing, duct cleaning, and AHU disinfection services, but customer experience detail is sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One five-star review supports the rating, but detail is limited. The business operates in commercial and industrial air conditioning alongside broader distribution services.
Two positive jobs done on time at fair prices. One severe installation failure led to a breakdown in communication: the boss became hostile when asked to fix the fault, and the company could not locate invoice records.
Evidence is limited to two reviews spanning a decade. One recent one-star account describes incomplete repair work, payment collected upfront, and legal action instead of resolution. A positive older review notes friendly staff. Current sentiment is heavily shaped by the unresolved complaint.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
A-Class Aircon Management shows split sentiment: two reviewers praise a named technician and years of consistent service, but three others report dangerous driving by company drivers and poor servicing that caused units to leak within a month. Scheduling is fast, but quality control appears weak.
Strong service and fair rates win regular clients, but repeated complaints about high-pressure tactics-especially targeting renters with threatened contract breaches-and contract reinterpretation after payment mark a troubling pattern. Service quality is uneven: some technicians solve problems well, others lack knowledge or cause damage.
Recent reviews show sharp splits: older five-stars praise punctual, friendly technicians and clear pricing; newer one-stars report recurring faults, high bills ($3000+), and incomplete repairs months after service. The business has operated since 1989 and holds BCA registration, but current evidence suggests quality and follow-up have deteriorated.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Limited review evidence. One five-star rating provides minimal detail. The business operates from Bedok and claims over 35 years of experience, offering aircon installation across HDB and condo units, though recent reviews do not clearly describe what drives customer satisfaction or concern.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Evidence is limited to two reviews split between praise and complaint. One customer found a skilled technician who solved a wiring problem creatively and cost-effectively; another reported money taken without communication or results.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Strong work on jobs, but customer relations are a risk. Five-star reviews praise punctual arrival, clean work, and long-term loyalty; one-star reviews flag defensive responses to problems, unwillingness to adjust hours, and unexpected charges after service failures.
Both five-star reviews praise the installation work and staff demeanor, though the limited feedback is now a decade old.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Gsn Starcool has completed installations to a decent standard, but reviewers report extended timelines, inadequate site cleanup, and disrespectful conduct during work. Limited evidence available; mixed ratings reflect these inconsistencies.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer reported that ERSA's condensation treatment failed to stop a leaking grille after application, and the business refused a refund citing a non-refundable policy. The reviewer suspected the company had misdiagnosed the root cause.
Crystal, Prabhu, and service technicians like Mahbub and Abbas earn consistent five-star praise for patience and skilled work. Yet repeated complaints paint a stark picture: gas and water leaks within days of installation, piping done poorly enough that a recheck five years later revealed mismatched insulation and inadequate taping, and installers who ignore customer instructions, demand hidden charges mid-job, and dismiss concerns with hostility. Sales promises do not survive into the field. Follow-up after problems is spotty or absent. Customers report being ignored for weeks after raising issues, receiving servicing vouchers they bin, and being pestered by sales calls after explicitly refusing them. One reviewer summed the pattern: "Display can be misleading." The company's trophies and promises do not match the experience delivered. A site survey before work begins is not standard practice here.
Two of three reviews describe poor installation quality and weak follow-up support. The warranty appears to lock customers into using STL for all future servicing, or coverage is voided. Evidence is limited and spans several years.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One detailed complaint describes filters broken during service, replaced without notice, and warranty denied after the fact. A single five-star review from seven years ago provides minimal context. Limited review evidence overall, but the negative account raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five of six reviews are one-star complaints spanning over a decade, alleging overcharging, poor follow-up on leaking units post-installation, and upselling of unnecessary work. One four-star review from 2012 stands alone. Evidence for the service tier is thin and overwhelmingly negative.
Last updated 2026-08-11